5 HOT TAKES
Generations of actors, directors and scholars have been mesmerised by Julius Caesar. Here’s what a few of today’s luminaries make of it.
“The play is heartbreaking. And it’s heartbreaking in the sense that nothing is resolved; that everything stays the way it is, and actually everything goes from bad to worse. That stable quality is what makes the play heartbreaking, because nobody wins in the play. Nobody wins. Everybody loses.”
- British actor Brian Cox
“If he [Brutus] can be persuaded that he needs to defend Rome by killing the leader of Rome then that’s what he’s going to do. And then at the same moment, he’s sort of being torn apart. It’s not easy for him to commit to the assassination.”
- Professor Michael Dobson, Shakespeare Institute
“Cassius is the most purely revolutionary character in the play. He is not hampered by love of Caesar as Brutus is. He is clear-eyed about the situation…”
- British actor Harriet Walter, author of Brutus and Other Heroines
“Something extraordinary was beginning to happen as Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar in the spring of 1599. The various strands of politics, character, inwardness, contemporary events, even Shakespeare’s own reflections on the act of writing, began to infuse each other. Brutus’ and Antony’s long funeral orations notwithstanding, Shakespeare was writing in an exceptionally spare and compressed style.”
- Professor James Shapiro, author of 1599: A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare
“Julius Caesar sees Shakespeare’s understanding of rhetoric feed fluently into a vision of how politics works. People are desiring machines: proud, envious, acquisitive, vengeful. To understand how words can be used to turn an audience into a community, or a crowd into a mob, is to understand the roots of power and the roots of human nature.”
- Sam Leith, author of You Talkin’ To Me: Rhetoric from Aristotle to Obama